Future (Concepts) of the Book?
The Future of the Book | IDEO
02.05.12
08:47 am
,
Currently: ˚
Feels Like: ˚
Hi: ˚, Lo: ˚![]()
weather feed courtesy of weather.com - thanks!
Fair
Hopefully
Yes
Working On It
“Delightfully visual, full of whimsy, adventure, and blithely caustic social commentary
… [a] smart, frolicsome, and charming first novel. ”
Booklist (Starred Review)
“Zany and entertaining… a generous and whacky story in the tradition of Tom Robbins.”
Publishers Weekly
“Going to See the Elephant” has been selected as one of the “7 Best Books” of the New Year.
Amazon.com
“Going to See the Elephant” is a vivid, giant mash note to the city by the bay. It’s an adventure story, a love story and a story about growing up.”
San Francisco Chronicle
“Rodes Fishburne has no interest in front-page realism — magic realism is more his thing. He’s a fantacist, and his sweet comic novel is as light as a bright balloon, and just as appealing.”
USA Today
“… a debut novel that’s hilarious, unpredictable, and lovely.”
Meaghan Leenaarts, Island Bookstore, Corolla, NC
“Going to See the Elephant” has been selected as a January 2009 selection of the Indie Next List!
IndieBound
“Slater Brown… is just the man I’d want to lead me through the streets of San Francisco…. Going to See the Elephant is a rollicking good tale… one can’t help falling in love.”
Michelle Richmond
“Going to See the Elephant will delight anybody who has ever written a first novel, wanted to write a first novel, and especially those who cherish reading unforgettable first novels. It is both funny and wise.”
James Patterson
“Rodes Fishburne is a marksman hunting down first-novel fame, and he never misses”
Tom Wolfe
The Future of the Book | IDEO
Canadian historian Michael Marrus gives a first-rate lecture about great trials. His first choice? Oscar Wilde’s great trial for “gross indecency” in 1895.
As the trial goes on we see Oscar make several major strategic mistakes, dazzle the court-room with his articulate defense of the love “that dare not speak its name,” and ultimately fail to flee the country–after being urged to do so by his friends–when he loses the case.
Why would he fail to flee the country? Even the court seems to half expect him to do so. Well because of a very important woman in his life. Can you guess who this woman might be?
His wife? No, that’s not quite right and certainly not very psychologically astute of you.
Who else would have that much power over the great free-thinking Oscar Wilde?
I’ll give you a hint, it rhymes with the word “SMOTHER”…
If you love this writer, and what writer doesn’t, you must listen to this podcast.
You can listen here, download here, and watch a video of the performance here.
Excerpt from the trial…
Charles Gill (prosecuting attorney): What is “the love that dare not speak its name?”
Wilde: “The love that dare not speak its name” in this century is such a great affection of an elder for a younger man as there was between David and Jonathan, such as Plato made the very basis of his philosophy, and such as you find in the sonnets of Michelangelo and Shakespeare. It is that deep spiritual affection that is as pure as it is perfect. It dictates and pervades great works of art, like those of Shakespeare and Michelangelo, and those two letters of mine, such as they are. It is in this century misunderstood, so much misunderstood that it may be described as “the love that dare not speak its name,” and on that account of it I am placed where I am now. It is beautiful, it is fine, it is the noblest form of affection. There is nothing unnatural about it. It is intellectual, and it repeatedly exists between an older and a younger man, when the older man has intellect, and the younger man has all the joy, hope and glamour of life before him. That it should be so, the world does not understand. The world mocks at it, and sometimes puts one in the pillory for it.”
Other stories caught your eye? Send ‘em or tweet @rodesfishburne
Here’s an synthesis of interesting articles about publishing and writing from the last couple of weeks…
Our friends at IPTIAM take a look at the economics behind the iPad and Apple’s forthcoming electronic bookstore.
Which brings up the question “If a book sells for $14.99 on Ipad, how much does an author get of that?”
a) $10.99
b) $4.99
c) $.99 cents and a free mousepad
d) none of the above
The answer might surprise you...

The writer Dani Shapiro explores some of the themes swirling around every writer’s head these days, i.e. how long is this state of transition in the publishing industry everybody is talking about going to last?
Her essay hints at what literary agents around NYC have been whispering for the past year: in the future a lot fewer people are going to self-identify as writers?
“But in the last several years, I’ve watched friends and colleagues suddenly find themselves without publishers after having brought out many books. Writers now use words like “track” and “mid-list” and “brand” and “platform.” They tweet and blog and make Facebook friends in the time they used to spend writing. Authors who stumble can find themselves quickly in dire straits. How, under these conditions, can a writer take the risks required to create something original and resonant and true?”
Other stories caught your eye? Send ‘em or tweet @rodesfishburne